2 items tagged "curation"

  • Making competitive enablement your expertise

    Making competitive enablement your expertise

    You’ve met with your stakeholders

    You’ve prioritized your competitors.

    You’ve built out a content framework, a battlecard template, an executive dashboard.

    You’ve laid the foundation, and you’re ready to rock and roll.

    What’s next?

    The real work of your competitive enablement program begins.

    In this article, I walk through how you can become the competitive enablement expert at your organization, including: 

    • What is curation and why is it important
    • Whether or not curation can be outsourced
    • How successful programs curate intel

    What is curation?

    The first step is to collect competitive intelligence on your competitors. Luckily, there is plenty of technology out there  that will scour the web for intelligence, filter it, and categorize it automatically for you. 

    Many platforms will also help you crowdsource intel from various stakeholders within your organization, via CRM data, email, Slack / Teams, and so on, to help you build a collaborative competitive culture

    But there is a final step to the intel collection process. You need to curate the relevant intel and add your unique perspective so it can be distributed to the right stakeholders in an actionable manner. 

    Curation is the last mile in the intel collection process.

    And curation needs to be done by you.

    Why is curating intel important?

    You know your business. And it’s not just industry-knowledge that you have. You know your buyer personas, your segments, your own solution’s strengths and weaknesses. You know what competitive intel will be important or interesting to your organization, and what intel will not.

    Put another way, intelligence needs to be filtered in two ways to be valuable and actionable for your business: 

    1. objectively: poor quality sources, duplicate articles about the same event, determining what’s a product release vs what’s a pricing change, and so on. This is objective, fact-based filtering.
    2. subjectively: specific around products within a portfolio, competitors you consider major threats vs anklebiters, customer reviews that give real insightful feedback about the competition that you didn’t know before, etc. These are subjective and specific to your unique expertise. 

    Combining objective facts with your organization’s unique characteristics is not only what makes intel actionable, but also what makes your role so powerful. It’s by doing this curation work that makes you the expert and puts your finger squarely on the pulse of the market.

    Can curation be outsourced?

    At this stage in building a program, many teams are tempted to leverage an analyst service to outsource the work of curation. In practice, there are a lot of risks to this approach for your competitive program, your business, and ultimately your reputation. 

    At best, an analyst is filtering out the news that is objectively poor quality. Duplicates, junk, irrelevant website changes, and so on. They can even help you categorize news into buckets. But it’s important to consider whether a third-party analyst would know what’s subjectively important for your business. 

    Furthermore, curating competitive intelligence is what makes you the expert within your organization. Those quick reps every day is what builds your competitive enablement muscle and builds your reputation as the go-to person for competitive insights. 

    Clara Smyth @ Slack (and many others) often shares that having her eyes and ears on the very edges of the business is what elevates her role and is why executives at Slack go to her for competitive insights.

    Curation is not only necessary, but incredibly valuable to CE experts. We asked hundreds of successful competitive enablement programs how they go about curating intel for their business. Independent of industry, company size, and even region, we learned that many programs triage intelligence in similar ways.

    How to curate competitive intel like the pros

    Intel is being generated every single day, both from the outside world, and from your inside teams. And so the first step that successful program owners take is they check their intel every single day. 

    It doesn’t need to take long. Most program owners report that they spend about 5-10 minutes per morning quickly reviewing the intelligence that appeared in the last day or two. This is a workflow we call triaging.

    In those 5-10 minutes, you sort intelligence into the following buckets: 

    Important – This is the intel that is actionable, and urgent. A competitor gets acquired. They release a new product. This is the kind of intel that you reschedule items in your calendar for – because it’s that critical.

    Interesting – This is the intel that is actionable, but not urgent. Your sales team loses a deal to a competitor. A new customer review is posted online. A competitor’s CEO does a reveal-all interview. You want to look deeper into these items, and it may produce something insightful, but it doesn’t require you to drop everything at this moment.

    Archived – This is the intel that doesn’t require action right now, but may be useful in the future. A competitor is attending an event, they’re hiring for a new position, you hear a rumour from the sales team about a lacking functionality… you don’t need to action on this right away, but you certainly want to save it to build your repository of intelligence over time.

    Now that your intel is sorted, you can go about the rest of your day. Maybe you have a time block later that afternoon to do some deeper analysis. That’s when you’ll dive deeper into your Important and Interesting items to do a more in-depth analysis, add context and meaning, and even distribute news-worthy items to the rest of your team via Slack / Teams, your email digest, a piece of content like a battlecard, and so on.

    Again — it’s worth considering how much of the above (if any) an external analyst could do for you effectively.

    This is the work that makes you the competitive expert for your organization.

    Author: Brandon Bedford

    Source: Klue

  • Unleashing the Power of Competitive Intelligence: How to Fine-Tune Your CI System for Maximum Impact  

    Unleashing the Power of Competitive Intelligence: How to Fine-Tune Your CI System for Maximum Impact

    Does your competitive intelligence system run like an outdated app you’ve been meaning to update? Do you find yourself dealing with performance issues and lag time when it comes to keeping people informed? If so, it may be time to run a diagnostic on your CI process. 

    Here are three common issues that may be hindering your competitive intelligence system’s performance, along with our tips on how to get rid of them: 

    1. Inadequate data collection: 

    Information gathering is at the heart of any successful competitive intelligence (CI) process. How successful you are at collecting a variety of information from an array of sources will determine how effective your process is as a whole, and will directly impact how well-informed your CI users are. If your collection strategy isn’t as strategic as it should be, you could be harming the rest of your CI process. 

    Signs

    • Content is collected infrequently or performed on an “as needed” basis (IE: when someone has a few hours to spare) 

    • Competitors and product lines of interest are poorly defined 

    • Major competitor updates are  missed or reported days later 

    • General industry news, trends and innovation is often overlooked 

    • Emerging potential competitors go unnoticed (until they make major news) 

    Suggested solution: Automation 
    While it may appear simple on the surface, data collection presents a major, ongoing challenge for even the most diligent CI team. The sheer volume of information produced online each day makes automated data collection a necessity for teams that are serious about competitive intelligence. In addition to providing more thorough, consistent results, automated web scraping solutions free up your employees’ time to focus on higher value tasks. 

     

    2. Flawed organization 

    If you’re sure that your collection process is up to par, but you still find yourself missing potentially valuable insights, there may be a problem with your system of organization. If your collection system is working properly, sorting and classifying the vast amount of content it finds can be a daunting task. The goal of any competitive intelligence system should be to transform random data into a resource that helps your company understand its place within the industry and defines what its competing against. Without ongoing, thoughtful organization, your competitive intelligence process is likely to become messy and confusing for the average user to navigate. 

    Signs: 

    • An ongoing flood of competitive intelligence content 

    • Inability to quickly sort by date, source, or associated competitors 

    • A lack of prioritization; all content is relayed with the same level of urgency 

    • Users may find themselves ignoring competitive intelligence briefings all together for weeks or months at a time 

    Suggested solution: Dedicated curation 
    Rather than leaving individual CI users to sort through a deluge of data on their own, consider assigning a dedicated curator to filter and classify information as it’s found. Your curator is responsible for winnowing down that initial influx of data based on relevance, cleaning up duplicate finds, and classifying relevant content so that it remains organized and searchable even as your CI database grows. Many businesses opt to outsource curation duties to an external analyst, in order to save time and ensure that curation remains an ongoing priority.  

     

    3. Poor distribution  

    The final step in a successful competitive intelligence process is ensuring that your meticulously collected, curated data is flowing quickly and efficiently throughout your organization. This includes ensuring that competitive intelligence users are notified when relevant information is found and creating mechanisms for users to customize what “relevant” means depending on their role. When distribution fails, your investment in the rest of the competitive intelligence process is essentially wasted, since the information you’re paying to find and curate isn’t reaching the stakeholders who might benefit from it. 

    Signs: 

    • Infrequent or incomplete competitive intelligence updates 

    • Few, if any, defined distribution channels 

    • Inadequate flow of information between competitive intelligence users and/or departments 

    • Lack of customizable options, leading to irrelevant briefings and loss of employee interest 

    Suggested solution: Customized briefings 
    Instead of defaulting to ad hoc methods or a one-size-fits-all competitive intelligence memo, invest in a distribution system that allows users to adjust the frequency and content of the updates they receive. By empowering users to manage their own CI needs, you increase the likelihood that they’ll find value in the information they receive. To that end, consider implementing a proactive distribution system-- one that notifies users via email briefings or newsletters, rather than expecting them to check a separate CI system for alerts and updates. 

    Source: CI Radar

EasyTagCloud v2.8